What is the difference between geomatics and gis

Gonzalez, L. Altamirano, J. Robles, Data mining with context information for satellite image classification. Ambiencia 4 , — Google Scholar. Last visited 7 Apr Kanjilal, H. Liu, M. Koperski, J. Adhikary, J. Lee, Geographical data and its acquisition, in Geographic Data Acquisition , ed. Chen, Y. Lee Springer, Wien, a , pp. Lee, Map projections, in Geographic Data Acquisition , ed. Lee Springer, Wien, b , pp. Li, H. Geophysics 66 , — CrossRef Google Scholar. Longley, M.

Goodchild, D. Maguire, D. Rhind, Geographical Information Systems and Science , 2nd edn. Wiley, Chichester, Google Scholar. Mok, J. Chao, Coordinate systems and datum, in Geographic Data Acquisition , ed. Lee Springer, Wien, , pp. Muggleton, Inverse entailment and progol. Ng, J. GIS risk management supports in the development of simple databases to advanced layers outlay.

Integration of GIS allows assessment of environmental effects on natural resources. Geomatics: Geomatics technology promote knowledge on environmental analysis and management. It is used as a crucial tool in analyzing environmental information systems and any natural resources. Collected data is stored in GIS database and it is represented in a mapped format.

Geomatics: Geomatics carries mapping division with the help of GIS. All analytical process in combination of mapping data results to map-based information.

Interestingly, in the original land surveys in much of North America, land surveyors were required to do both — i. Notify me of follow-up comments by email. Notify me of new posts by email. This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed. Geomatics: Results in the generation of logical decisions for the action plans or policies related to the integrated information. It relies on timely information from various resources.

While I appreciate the difficulty in trying to forge a commonly understood discipline identity geomatics , much of this article is predicted on a misleading view of another.

This writing mapping and spatial analysis has been occurring for millennia, and is now enhanced by tools and algorithms as provided by Geomatics matics meaning performing, self-acting. In other words, Geomatics enables us to represent the Earth, and any features on it, and in essence, helps many geographers do Geography. Note the term geospatial. Geospatial is not limited to a discipline, nor belonging to Geomatics as suggested above. It is a perspective or way of thinking that is critical to both Geography and Geomatics and others: Environmental Science, Geology etc….

That is not owned by a discipline. Ultimately, I think the main point of the article is that each of the disciplines, while closely related, has their own skill sets and competencies that need to be respected. I can agree with that. Hopefully better awareness of both will help.

Golledge, R. Geographical Research, 46 1 , Ishikawa, T. Geospatial thinking and spatial ability: An empirical examination of knowledge and reasoning in geographical science. The Professional Geographer, 65 4 , Yes, GIS is a toolset, but a large part of that toolset is knowledge; both of the tools themselves, and also of geospatial problem sets and how the tools can be applied to solve them.

These are the people I have been providing expert GIS advice and leadership to for the past couple of decades. Make no mistake…they are all professionals. I think we do a disservice to those of us for whom GIS is much more than a toolset when we discribe it as such.

The Ishikawa study was about a geospatial thinking test with results pointing to the necessity of targeted instruction for geospatial learning. The Golledge article assumes facilitation of learning to comprehend the geospatial environment. Neither is available without purchase nor in the public library, nor are they germane to my opinions above as they have to do with learning and not the two fields discussed in general.

Geomatics root is actually geographical informatics, not matics, and was coined in Canada by Michel Paradis. GIS, for Mr. A GIS is an information system. The original concept and implementation that Roger Tomlinson developed included things like custom built scanner hardware, digitizing tables, reports and other printouts.

I find my students have a much better understanding when they start using the tool kits hardware, software, imagery and other data, sensors, GPS … to develop an information system, geographic. Now here is the question: what do you call a professional who builds information systems that handle geographic data?

I first put hand to mouse in the service of Geographic Information in , not quite 25 years ago. The only difference I see between then and now is that slightly more people have heard the words.

As evidenced by this article and commentary the argument itself carries on, with little signs of abating. Hmmm, indeed. Following this line of reason, Surveying is not a profession, and is just a toolset.

Only Surveyors though can create surveys. Similarly paint, rollers, brushes and drop cloths are tools for house painting. Anyone with intent and willingness to learn can use the Painting Toolset to good or at least noticeable effect. In the course of life most of us probably will use them even if only for a bedroom or closet. There are a class of people who are indubitably Painters with a capital P.

The ones you want and need when the work and result is important. The professionals who get the job done rightly and excellently. I work in the Geomatics field perhaps, depends on your stance in the debate. In any case Geomatics is in my job title because my employer put it there. I do not however consider myself a Geomatics Professional, and have no aspiration to be one. I am however, completely and thoroughly, a GIS Professional. Someone who excels at using my chosen tools, and aspires and practices to continually improve my proficiency and skill those tools.

The topic and picture are interesting. But, I strongly disagree one thing. Is very wrong. As the author says, Geography can be distinguished into Physical and Social Geography. Starting by a definition of an university about a particular science is to much subjective. I can imagine why you write this article, probably to justify the refused applications of those geographers who applied for professional Geomatics designation and closing the door for the others who tend to apply!

However, let me as a geographer explain the construction of geography shortly. Geography now is constructed since it started … with three main field: Physical geography, Human geography and Technical geography. I call the technical geography as the Integrated geography which is a science and engineering discipline as well.

So, to me the Technical geography is much more than Geomatics and even Geomatics is a sub-discipline of the Technical geography and nothing more at all If a bag is a technical geography then geomatics is a pocket of that bag. To address Rizah Murseli, although provincial governments remain ultimately responsible for public safety and well-being, it entrusts this responsibility to professional self-regulatory associations such as doctors, engineers and others.