Which circuit is delaware in

At the end of the term , the Third Circuit had the seventh highest reversal rate of the 13 federal circuit courts of appeal. Below is the total data ranging from to present listed by the circuit where the case originated. It also contains data from state courts, U. The following are noteworthy cases heard before this court.

To suggest cases we should cover here, email us. To read opinions published by this court, click here. Jones, III of the Middle District of Pennsylvania to dismiss a suit brought by a group of Pennsylvania judges challenging the state's retirement age law. Judge Jones found those arguments "unconvincing," further noting that the plaintiffs did not have a due process claim as they did not have a constitutionally protected property interest in continued judicial employment.

In an opinion written by Judge Ambro, the plaintiff judges' claims were again rebuked, with Ambro stating that their Fourteenth Amendment rights had not been violated. Judge Ambro found that the plaintiffs' claims that opinions reached in United States v. Windsor and Shelby County v. Holder served as intervening authority failed as a matter of law.

Auernheimer emailed the details of their find to several media outlets, and shared the full list of emails generated with a writer from Gawker, a news and gossip website. While Auernheimer resided in Arkansas and the servers affected were located in Texas and Georgia, he was prosecuted in New Jersey federal court, which Auernheimer argued was an improper venue under the circumstances. The District of New Jersey rationalized this course of action by saying that the email addresses of 4, New Jersey residents appeared on Auernheimer's list.

In , a jury convicted Auernheimer of identity fraud and conspiracy to access a computer without authorization, and in March , he was sentenced by Judge Susan Wigenton to forty-one months in prison. On appeal to the Third Circuit, the three-judge panel found that Auernheimer's conviction must be vacated because of improper venue. Writing for the court in a precedential decision, Judge Chagares noted that New Jersey was "not the site of either essential conduct element" of the CFAA -- Auernheimer neither accessed nor obtained the unauthorized information in the state at any time.

Auernheimer was released after having spent thirteen months in prison. On March 26, , a three-judge panel of the Third Circuit, composed of Judges Thomas Ambro , Michael Fisher , and Thomas Hardiman , ruled that a non-fiction book was not defamatory even though it addressed a married woman's affair with her boss.

The book recounted the work of the Vidocq Society, a Philadelphia-based forensic group, and its founding member, Frank Bender. Bender's assistant, Joan Crecenz, filed a lawsuit in , alleging that she was defamed and suffered false light invasion of privacy as a result of Capuzzo's "reckless casting" of her as one of her boss's "girlfriends.

Crecenz appealed to the Third Circuit, which affirmed the ruling. Judge Hardiman, on behalf of the majority, wrote: [6].

On October 23, , in a precedential opinion, a three-judge panel of the Third Circuit , composed of Judge D. The FBI identified pages of documents related to the ACLU's request, but released only pages, citing pages as duplicative and pages as exempt from disclosure. Citing several exemptions to FOIA rules, the FBI filed a motion for summary judgment Refers to a judgment granted on a claim about which there is no genuine issue of fact and to which the party moving for judgment prevails as a matter of law.

This prompted the ACLU to file a cross-motion for summary judgment Refers to a judgment granted on a claim about which there is no genuine issue of fact and to which the party moving for judgment prevails as a matter of law.

Judge Salas refused, and granted the FBI's motion for summary judgment Refers to a judgment granted on a claim about which there is no genuine issue of fact and to which the party moving for judgment prevails as a matter of law. The ACLU filed an appeal. Writing for three-judge panel of the Third Circuit, Judge Smith rejected the ACLU's "novel [Glomarization] proposal," and stated that "ample evidence" was available in support of Judge Salas' decision.

Smith further noted that it would be "hard to imagine how the FBI could provide a more detailed justification for withholding information under this exemption without compromising the very information it sought to protect.

This section focuses on cases the U. Supreme Court heard that originated in this court. The following cases were scheduled for argument before the U. Supreme Court during the term. In order to qualify for the office of chief judge in one of the federal courts, a judge must have been in active service on the court for at least one year, be under the age of 65, and have not previously served as chief judge.

A vacancy in the office of chief judge is filled by the judge highest in seniority among the group of qualified judges. The chief judge serves for a term of seven years or until age 70, whichever occurs first. A statutory change in the s created the seven-year term. The age restrictions are waived if no members of the court would otherwise be qualified for the position. Unlike the chief justice of the United States, a chief judge returns to active service after the expiration of his or her term and does not create a vacancy on the bench by the fact of his or her promotion.

The Third Circuit shares the James A. The courthouse was designed by LZA Technology and opened in as part of the Bicentennial of the Declaration of Independence celebration. Virgin Islands. Below, please find information about our print and microformat resources for the Third Circuit. The following titles link to fuller bibliographic information in the Library of Congress Online Catalog. Links to additional digital content are provided when available.

Search this Guide Search. Reports, publications and statistics of the Judiciary. Research and register trade, business or fictitious names. Adoption Custody Divorce Guardianship Support. Access to Justice. Delaware Courts. The Delaware Judicial Branch cares about the health and safety of its employees and the public we serve. In criminal cases, the Justice of the Peace Court hears certain misdemeanors and most motor vehicle cases excluding felonies and the Justices of the Peace may act as committing magistrates for all crimes.

All permissible appeals are to the Court of Common Pleas, with the exception of findings of juvenile delinquency for contempt of court related to truancy proceedings which may be appealed to Family Court.

In criminal cases, the Court of Common Pleas handles all misdemeanors occurring in the State except certain drug-related offenses and traffic offenses. Appeals may be taken to the Superior Court. The Court is also responsible for all preliminary hearings in felony cases.

The Family Court has extensive jurisdiction over virtually all family and juvenile matters. All civil appeals, including those relating to juvenile delinquency, go directly to the Supreme Court while criminal cases are appealed to the Superior Court. The Superior Court , the State's court of general jurisdiction, has original jurisdiction over criminal and civil cases except equity cases.

The Court has exclusive jurisdiction over felonies and almost all drug offenses. In civil matters, the Court's authority to award damages is not subject to a monetary maximum.